dank
Junior Member
Posts: 141
|
Post by dank on Aug 29, 2013 3:21:14 GMT
Edit who gives a fock. It's a tarp
|
|
|
Post by me20xx on Aug 29, 2013 3:29:11 GMT
Do you not think it was sufficiently covered? C'mon man, you don't need to be Einstein to know it's been beaten to death. To be fair, it was beaten to death in self defense.
|
|
|
Post by shonuff on Aug 29, 2013 3:31:18 GMT
I agree, it's been discussed a lot. I was testing the waters here. Yep, the water is warm from all you babies peeing. Seems someone is pissed people wanted to get away from the crap...so you came here slinging some. Talk about being a baby...all you have done here is cried about people not discussing a topic that get beaten to death for months. Its over...who the fock cares anymore about Zimmerman?
|
|
|
Post by wiffleball on Aug 29, 2013 12:11:09 GMT
Fock off... this has been discussed to point of overkill already. :gfiafp: Times 10000
|
|
|
Post by newbiejr on Aug 29, 2013 12:25:43 GMT
I agree, it's been discussed a lot. I was testing the waters here. Yep, the water is warm from all you babies peeing. What part of 'no politics' don't you understand? They've invited members, even those who've partaken in a lot of political threads over at FFToday, who they believed could be positive contributors to this board WITHOUT talking about politics. Apparently, someone believed you were well-rounded enough to meet those qualifications. So why come here and try to prove them wrong? NO POLITICS. It's what ruined the other board. There are ten Zimmerman threads over there. Go back and bump them if you think this still needs discussing.
|
|
|
Post by wiffleball on Aug 29, 2013 12:38:04 GMT
I agree, it's been discussed a lot. I was testing the waters here. Yep, the water is warm from all you babies peeing. What part of 'no politics' don't you understand? They've invited members, even those who've partaken in a lot of political threads over at FFToday, who they believed could be positive contributors to this board WITHOUT talking about politics. Apparently, someone believed you were well-rounded enough to meet those qualifications. So why come here and try to prove them wrong? NO POLITICS. It's what ruined the other board. There are ten Zimmerman threads over there. Go back and bump them if you think this still needs discussing. Well, I don't think Zimmermanthreads are necessarily 'political'. But, the case if over, it's been done to death - and thta's a good enough reason to not bring it up again. If we're going to run away screaming from any current event / topic and spend all day talking about how dead FFT is...
|
|
|
Post by newbiejr on Aug 29, 2013 12:52:00 GMT
What part of 'no politics' don't you understand? They've invited members, even those who've partaken in a lot of political threads over at FFToday, who they believed could be positive contributors to this board WITHOUT talking about politics. Apparently, someone believed you were well-rounded enough to meet those qualifications. So why come here and try to prove them wrong? NO POLITICS. It's what ruined the other board. There are ten Zimmerman threads over there. Go back and bump them if you think this still needs discussing. Well, I don't think Zimmermanthreads are necessarily 'political'. But, the case if over, it's been done to death - and thta's a good enough reason to not bring it up again. If we're going to run away screaming from any current event / topic and spend all day talking about how dead FFT is... The Zimmerman case is VERY political. Go read the threads at the Geek Club. And JTB was trying to stir things up. Or, in his own words, 'testing the waters'.
|
|
|
Post by mmmmmbeer on Aug 29, 2013 12:52:53 GMT
Nop, this is absolutely political... tookit fox... lookit cnn.... lookit msnbc... the white house.... talk radio... this is a hooogly political topic. And really... can lead to nothing but :pillowfight: so no... I think its what we got tired of and doesn't have a place on the new "Main" bored.
|
|
|
Post by wiffleball on Aug 29, 2013 13:02:51 GMT
Nop, this is absolutely political... tookit fox... lookit cnn.... lookit msnbc... the white house.... talk radio... this is a hooogly political topic. Geesus, a thread on your favorite "Hot Pocket" on the GB would become political. That doesn't make Hot Pockets 'political'... Obummer hosted the Bears - can we not talk about them now? I'm already starting to see where this bored's struggling to find its identity. Are we going to ban any story that's reported on a news site? Or are we going to designate certain news sites non-political are therefore "okay" to discuss. I thought tthe whole point of this experiment is to be able (in part) to bring up current events WITHOUT the political / slap fight (TILT! Stalker! Crying!) crap from guys like RP. Again, I think the Zimm thing should be nuked for the fact that it been done to death. But, I think we need to figure out the difference between 'political' and 'controversial'. If not, there's only so many posts we can make on how dead FFT is without us...
|
|
|
Post by newbiejr on Aug 29, 2013 13:10:13 GMT
Nop, this is absolutely political... tookit fox... lookit cnn.... lookit msnbc... the white house.... talk radio... this is a hooogly political topic. Geesus, a thread on your favorite "Hot Pocket" on the GB would become political. That doesn't make Hot Pockets 'political'... Obummer hosted the Bears - can we not talk about them now? I'm already starting to see where this bored's struggling to find its identity. Are we going to ban any story that's reported on a news site? Or are we going to designate certain news sites non-political are therefore "okay" to discuss. I thought tthe whole point of this experiment is to be able (in part) to bring up current events WITHOUT the political / slap fight (TILT! Stalker! Crying!) crap from guys like RP. Again, I think the Zimm thing should be nuked for the fact that it been done to death. But, I think we need to figure out the difference between 'political' and 'controversial'. If not, there's only so many posts we can make on how dead FFT is without us... So, let me ask you this.....what do you think JTB's intentions were when he started a thread that has already been done to death at the old board? Take into consideration that he admitted he was testing the waters.
|
|
|
Post by wiffleball on Aug 29, 2013 13:14:27 GMT
Geesus, a thread on your favorite "Hot Pocket" on the GB would become political. That doesn't make Hot Pockets 'political'... Obummer hosted the Bears - can we not talk about them now? I'm already starting to see where this bored's struggling to find its identity. Are we going to ban any story that's reported on a news site? Or are we going to designate certain news sites non-political are therefore "okay" to discuss. I thought tthe whole point of this experiment is to be able (in part) to bring up current events WITHOUT the political / slap fight (TILT! Stalker! Crying!) crap from guys like RP. Again, I think the Zimm thing should be nuked for the fact that it been done to death. But, I think we need to figure out the difference between 'political' and 'controversial'. If not, there's only so many posts we can make on how dead FFT is without us... So, let me ask you this.....what do you think JTB's intentions were when he started a thread that has already been done to death at the old board? Take into consideration that he admitted he was testing the waters. You said it yourself - he was testing the waters, indeed. But the idea that the thread should be nooked because it is necessarily 'political' is spurious. Fundamentally, the subject could be discussed in a political vaccuum and based strictly upon legal issues alone. Still, we both agree that was a poor subject to bring up - even if for different reasons. But, like I said, we DO need to figure out the diff between 'political' and 'controversial'.
|
|
|
Post by ihadworms on Aug 29, 2013 14:13:54 GMT
Geesus, a thread on your favorite "Hot Pocket" on the GB would become political. That doesn't make Hot Pockets 'political'... Obummer hosted the Bears - can we not talk about them now? I'm already starting to see where this bored's struggling to find its identity. Are we going to ban any story that's reported on a news site? Or are we going to designate certain news sites non-political are therefore "okay" to discuss. I thought tthe whole point of this experiment is to be able (in part) to bring up current events WITHOUT the political / slap fight (TILT! Stalker! Crying!) crap from guys like RP. Again, I think the Zimm thing should be nuked for the fact that it been done to death. But, I think we need to figure out the difference between 'political' and 'controversial'. If not, there's only so many posts we can make on how dead FFT is without us... So, let me ask you this.....what do you think JTB's intentions were when he started a thread that has already been done to death at the old board? Take into consideration that he admitted he was testing the waters. His intentions were clearly to instigate. Wiff--I understand your position here, but let's just agree this particular thread is improper and leave it at that. Don't let the troll think he's won.
|
|
|
Post by bigblue06 on Aug 29, 2013 19:51:32 GMT
Do you not think it was sufficiently covered? C'mon man, you don't need to be Einstein to know it's been beaten to death. To be fair, it was beaten to death in self defense. Really, no love for this one?? :lolsmile:
|
|
|
Post by jtb on Aug 29, 2013 21:08:10 GMT
How bout I state my own intentions instead of worms and newbie telling me why I started the tread.
Let me splain....i may be able to be convinced Zimmerman should have been found guilty. I have yet to hear why so many believe he is a racist murderer and I was hoping civil discussion could help me better understand the opposite point if view. I get it though....back to lightly petting each other and serving softballs to each other so you can feel all nicey nicey about yourself.
Carry on.
|
|
|
Post by edjr on Aug 29, 2013 21:22:28 GMT
How bout I state my own intentions instead of worms and newbie telling me why I started the tread. Let me splain....i may be able to be convinced Zimmerman should have been found guilty. I have yet to hear why so many believe he is a racist murderer and I was hoping civil discussion could help me better understand the opposite point if view. I get it though....back to lightly petting each other and serving softballs to each other so you can feel all nicey nicey about yourself. Carry on. it's well intentioned, but it should have been here on the political board. you are not totally wrong in thinking the burger king thread is political, but when people hear super size my pay it doesn't send them off into a political tizzy.
|
|