|
|
Post by French Maid on Sept 24, 2013 2:46:57 GMT
Would you give up C.J. Spiller and Stevie Johnson for Harkeem Nicks and Alfred Morris?
12 team PPR
My current roster:
Aaron Rodgers
CJ Spiller
Lamar Miller
Roddy White
Stevie Johnson
Jason Witten
Greg Olsen
Kendall Wright
Greg Jennings
Greg Little
Danny Woodhead
Rashad Jennings
Marcus Wheaton
Michael Bush
Percy Harvin
Ryan Tannehill
Matt Bryant
Chicago DEF
|
|
|
|
Post by cbfalcon on Sept 24, 2013 2:57:34 GMT
Yes. Immediately.
Spiller has more potential than Morris. But Spiller is hurt and a less safe bet to be productive. Nicks has more potential than SJ.
|
|
|
|
Post by bigblue06 on Sept 24, 2013 3:02:57 GMT
Didn't even look at your roster, didn't need to. Do this trade before the other guy sobers up. I don't care if you get anything from Nicks going forward or not; I would trade your two for Morris alone.
|
|
|
|
Post by oldschool on Sept 24, 2013 3:06:12 GMT
Do it
|
|
|
|
Post by French Maid on Sept 24, 2013 3:11:42 GMT
So, if this is such a good thing for me... why is he offering it?
|
|
|
|
Post by bigblue06 on Sept 24, 2013 3:55:09 GMT
So, if this is such a good thing for me... why is he offering it? Because Nicks just put up a big fat 0 with 1 target and Spiller is ridiculous with potential. Also, alcohol. |
|
|
|
Post by heavy-set on Sept 24, 2013 11:14:00 GMT
not in PPR
steve johnson is better than nicks and Alf morris doesnt catch passes.
plus, Alf morris is on bye next week.
if you are gonna do it, do it after alf's bye, that way you avoid a bye week for your #1 rb
|
|
|
|
Post by bigblue06 on Sept 24, 2013 11:41:38 GMT
not in PPR steve johnson is better than nicks and Alf morris doesnt catch passes. plus, Alf morris is on bye next week. if you are gonna do it, do it after alf's bye, that way you avoid a bye week for your #1 rb That's the beauty of opinions; everyone has their own and is entitled to it. Having said that, you're wrong in every way. I think that Nicks will actually catch more passes than Johnson the rest of the way (going out on a limb, considering the putrid performance last week). Plus, I think that Morris is the important part of this deal. Even if Johnson > Nicks, the difference isn't much. I think the difference between Morris and Spiller more than makes up for it. |
|
|
|
Post by heavy-set on Sept 24, 2013 13:33:17 GMT
not in PPR steve johnson is better than nicks and Alf morris doesnt catch passes. plus, Alf morris is on bye next week. if you are gonna do it, do it after alf's bye, that way you avoid a bye week for your #1 rb That's the beauty of opinions; everyone has their own and is entitled to it. Having said that, you're wrong in every way. I think that Nicks will actually catch more passes than Johnson the rest of the way (going out on a limb, considering the putrid performance last week). Plus, I think that Morris is the important part of this deal. Even if Johnson > Nicks, the difference isn't much. I think the difference between Morris and Spiller more than makes up for it. :rofl: "your're wrong in every way" opinions cant be wrong. they are opinions. if you think that Nicks will catch more passes, than why trade him? fuck the rest of the way, the past 3 weeks has to be used to determine the value of the players. of course Morris is an important part of the deal, but this is PPR, making spiller more attractive. morris needs to go for 100 and a td to be relevant and it aint looking good in washington. lastly, why trade for morris when you cant even play him next week in a bye? seems silly to me. might as well just wait 2 weeks and pull the trigger if you wanted to do the deal. |
|
|
|
Post by bigblue06 on Sept 24, 2013 14:07:49 GMT
That's the beauty of opinions; everyone has their own and is entitled to it. Having said that, you're wrong in every way. I think that Nicks will actually catch more passes than Johnson the rest of the way (going out on a limb, considering the putrid performance last week). Plus, I think that Morris is the important part of this deal. Even if Johnson > Nicks, the difference isn't much. I think the difference between Morris and Spiller more than makes up for it. :rofl: "your're wrong in every way" opinions cant be wrong. they are opinions. if you think that Nicks will catch more passes, than why trade him? fuck the rest of the way, the past 3 weeks has to be used to determine the value of the players. of course Morris is an important part of the deal, but this is PPR, making spiller more attractive. morris needs to go for 100 and a td to be relevant and it aint looking good in washington. lastly, why trade for morris when you cant even play him next week in a bye? seems silly to me. might as well just wait 2 weeks and pull the trigger if you wanted to do the deal. I was actually kidding about your opinion being wrong. It's an opinion. I see your points, but I think I'd still pull the trigger. |
|
|
|
Post by heavy-set on Sept 24, 2013 14:18:34 GMT
:rofl: "your're wrong in every way" opinions cant be wrong. they are opinions. if you think that Nicks will catch more passes, than why trade him? fuck the rest of the way, the past 3 weeks has to be used to determine the value of the players. of course Morris is an important part of the deal, but this is PPR, making spiller more attractive. morris needs to go for 100 and a td to be relevant and it aint looking good in washington. lastly, why trade for morris when you cant even play him next week in a bye? seems silly to me. might as well just wait 2 weeks and pull the trigger if you wanted to do the deal. I was actually kidding about your opinion being wrong. It's an opinion. I see your points, but I think I'd still pull the trigger. i see your points too, but its more fun to argue :bls: spiller might be crap in buffalo's offense and with fjax getting so many touches. |
|
|
|
Post by French Maid on Sept 24, 2013 15:20:17 GMT
Wait... now I'm confused. Is heavy-set telling me not to pull the trigger because he's in my league?
Here's my opinion, from a girl who doesn't know that much about football: I think Johnson is on the rise. He's been heavily targeted and seems to have a very good rapport with this new QB... so, I'm reluctant to trade him because WR is currently my weakest position.
Not sure about Spiller/Morris...
|
|
|
|
Post by heavy-set on Sept 24, 2013 15:37:24 GMT
Wait... now I'm confused. Is heavy-set telling me not to pull the trigger because he's in my league? Here's my opinion, from a girl who doesn't know that much about football: I think Johnson is on the rise. He's been heavily targeted and seems to have a very good rapport with this new QB... so, I'm reluctant to trade him because WR is currently my weakest position. Not sure about Spiller/Morris... IMO, s.johnson > h.nicks but, morris is prolly better than spiller cause spiller is in a timeshare. but, a.morris is on bye next week, so why deal for him now? if you wanna do the deal thats, you arent getting ripped off, it just makes more sense to do it after alf's bye week. and not only are we in the same league, but we play this week. no a.rodgers , this week.  |
|
|
|
Post by cbfalcon on Sept 24, 2013 15:43:05 GMT
In my experience, an offer made this week may not be available next week. HTH
Trade or no trade, OM will have to deal with a bye week for Morris or Spiller at some point.... Trying to maneuver so that you never have a bye week but your trade partner has to deal with 2 of them for his top RB? Tricky and nice if you can pull it off, but a potential deal killer for a decent owner.
|
|
|
|
Post by French Maid on Sept 24, 2013 16:03:57 GMT
Hey heavy-set... if you read the fine print for our league, it clearly stipulates that you have to let OldMaid win.
|
|
